|
 |
| |
Not Green: Black problems…
26 August 2007
Permalink
China´s overwhelming environmental problems have made the country one of the world´s leading contributors to global environmental problems, surpassing the USA as the world´s largest contributor of carbon dioxide.
There is a very high price to pay.
Lack of access to clean water and air is only one of the problems the People´s Republic of China is facing. According to Elizabeth Economy, in her latest review in Foreign Affairs, (read it here: http://www.foreignaffairs.org/20070901faessay86503/elizabeth-c-economy/the-great-leap-backward.html) more than 75% of the river water in China is undrinkable and unfit for fishing, whereas 30% is unsuitable for agriculture and industrial use. 700 million people drink contaminated water with animal and human waste. A study by the World Bank has reported that the leading cause of death among children under the age of five and 11% of the cases of gastrointestinal cancer in China is the lack of piped water. There are also increasing rates of diarrhea diseases, cancer, tumors, leukemia and stunt growth.
Another report by Elizabeh Economy, (read it here: http://www.cfr.org/publication/5573/chinas_environmental_challenge.html), mentions that the air quality in more than 300 Chinese cities failed to pass the acceptable levels of total suspended particles set by the World Health Organization, causing an increase in the number of cancer disease across the country. Other organizations and institutes are also blaming the air pollution to an increase of premature deaths related to respiratory diseases.
The Chinese government is encountering social unrest within the country and increased international political pressure from abroad, not to mention the economic burden that needs to be invested in order control the situation.
Some Chinese report that international buyers and multinational corporations also contribute to China´s environmental degradation. Buyers keep pushing for lower prices and fast lead times, which in turn, don´t allow for factories to comply with the minimum environmental standards required by the law.
The world keeps pushing China to lower their carbon emissions, to cut down on coal consumption, to invest money in environmental projects… but people seem to forget about environmental concerns when it comes to buying from the Chinese factories. Few companies ask for factories to comply with green standards, let alone pay a higher price for a product from those few companies that do comply.
Is the world willing to invest in making the changes that it needs to counteract the environmental degradation it faces today?
Are companies ready to pay a higher price for an environmentally safe produced product?
If you were buying from China, would you sacrifice your profit margin to buy from environmentally friendly factories? |
|
Problems in finding good employees in China?
26 August 2007
Permalink
A briefing in this week’s Economist (read it here) look into the troubles companies are having in finding talents in China.: “IT SEEMS odd. In the world's most populous region the biggest problem facing employers is a shortage of people. Asia has more than half the planet's inhabitants and is home to many of the world's fastest-growing economies. But some businesses are being forced to reconsider just how quickly they will be able to grow, because they cannot find enough people with the skills they need.
A study by the McKinsey Global Institute predicts that 75,000 business leaders will be needed in China in the next ten years. It estimates the current stock at just 3,000 to 5,000. And that assessment could prove optimistic. The study, which covered a broad spectrum of businesses and surveyed more than 80 human-resources managers, found that less than “10% of Chinese job candidates, on average, were suitable for work in a foreign company.”
This talent shortage is predicted to get worse in the year to come with the growth of Chinese companies and increase in foreign investment: ” With such a mismatch between supply and demand in Asia's labour markets, companies will have to become better at hiring good staff and keeping them. But as some companies will always be better at this than others, the job-hopping and poaching are set to continue for many years, until education and training catch up. The consequences of that are stark. “It will limit the growth. It has to,” says Korn/Ferry's Mr Bekins. Which means that without talented recruiting policies, some firms may end up scaling back their bold Asian growth-plans.“

|
|
Keep buying from China, but beware.
16 August 2007
Permalink
The hard lesson from the latest recall of products made in China is that Businesses have to manage the risks and liabilities of Chinese products.
“'That's the price of doing business" is the too-often-heard excuse from American companies that choose to overlook China's loose business ethics and tight (verging on strangling) political controls.“ accuses The editorial in today’s IHT (full article here). “The high cost of such enabling was on display, once again, Tuesday when Mattel announced that it is recalling millions of Chinese-made toys contaminated with lead paint or containing dangerously easy to swallow magnets. And that follows discoveries of Chinese toothpaste laced with industrial solvents and drug-contaminated seafood.”
The editorial stresses that “Right now it is the clear responsibility of companies that import Chinese products to guarantee their safety, and U.S. regulators have to ensure they do it adequately”.
Fulfilling this responsibility is proven difficult for foreign companies: their capability of controlling what they buy is undermined by a lack of visibility of what really happens inside the factories in China (Mattel, which is a best practice on implementing safety standards, was not able detect what was happening albeit it has been doing business with that supplier for 15 years) and by a buying culture where all it counts is “best price”; it means razor thin margin for Chinese supplier and a push to cut corners to remain competitive.
The Economist (read its editorial on this matter here) is pessimistic that the Chinese Government will be able to effect change albeit willingness to do so, and that onus to manage the product safety risk rest on foreign buyers: “In practice, however, effecting change will be difficult. Unhealthy links between government and business, combined with patchy implementation of rules and regulations, mean that China has a political culture that will be hard to transform quickly. There is anecdotal evidence, for example, of "product fade", whereby some Chinese companies ensure that the first few batches of products delivered meet the required standard, before quality gradually tails off as quality inputs are replaced with cheaper equivalents. Regardless of the Chinese government's efforts, the onus is therefore likely to fall on Western importers and retailers to conduct more product checks on goods made in China, in order to forestall the negative publicity caused by the discovery of substandard products.

|
|
Don’t hold your breath for the Yuan revaluation to slow Chinese export: EU and US consumers will pay for it
August 7, 2007
Permalink
“Those who closely follow the mainland economy, the last few years have provided another interesting spectacle. Remember that the yuan has been strengthening gradually against the dollar, by 2% in 2005, another 4% in 2006 and at a 6% year-on-year pace so far this year. At the same time, Chinese rural migrant wages, which were rising leisurely at 3% to 4% per year at the beginning of the decade, are now shooting up by 10% or even 15% annually as factories come to terms with a dwindling supply of young, single farm workers.
This double-edged sword of an appreciating currency and rising labor costs should have imposed palpable damage on China’s traditional export sectors: toys, clothing, furniture, appliances and electronics processing. However, according to industrial earnings and profit statistics, overall light manufacturing margins have been as steady as a rock, with no signs of pressure so far.
Why? Because exporters simply passed on the costs to overseas buyers.”
In an essay for the Far Eastern Economic review (read the article here) “Jonathan Anderson, chief Asian economist at UBS, dispels common myths about the Chinese exchange rate and explains why yuan revaluation is the only remedy for China’s economic “whiplash.”

|
|
Connecting productivity to corporate social responsibility
July 25, 2007
Permalink
Amy Wong, in an article for China Business Review (www.chinabusinessreview.com), suggests western buyers to rethink their auditing approach to support corporate social responsibility amongst their Chinese supply chain. Her articles advocates for those efforts focused “on tracing the root cause of [labor standards] violations to core business processes and management systems that may be absent or weak, rather than on simply identifying checklist of violations. For example, if a factory has poor quality control, it will likely have a high rate of defective products, requiring workers to spend extra time to remanufacture or repair the defective units. Moreover, if the factory must ship the order on a tight deadline, its employees may need to work overtime beyond what is legally permitted. But those workers may not receive overtime pay because the only way for the factory owner to make a profit is to withhold the extra compensation. This example shows that excessive overtime and wage arrears, two common violations reported by auditors, can result from poor quality control, a core business process”.
Amongst the initiatives that have pioneered this approach in China is Impactt’s Overtime Project (www.impacttlimited.com), the Factory Improvement Training 5 program of TUV Rheinland Group (www.tuv.com), BSR’s China Training Initiative (www.bsr.org) and the Global Suppliers Institute Program of the Kenan Institue (www.kenan-flagler.unc.edu). |
|
Summer Sourcing Show for Gifts, Houseware & Toys
July 6, 2007
Permalink
This week Hong Kong hosts the Summer Sourcing Show for Gifts, Houseware & Toys. Over 800 exhibitors are showing their latest products to international buyers. The shows is divided into the following category: gift ideas, dining & cooking, style & décor, home living, fun & play, ladies’ world and costume jewellery.
TriSource Asia is visiting the show looking for new products and is putting together a presentation of some of the most interesting items. Click here to download a PDF file to see some of the hot products we found and contact us if you are interested in a quotation.
|
|
Hong Kong, China: 10 years’ anniversary.
June 25, 2007
Permalink
It has been 10 years since the handover, and Hong Kong sparkles. But can it find still greater success in a changing China — and a changing world?
Time magazine dedicates a special report on Hong Kong, looking at the city’s future, assessing the past decades from the views of 5 opinion leaders, narrating the story of one of its family and analyzing its connections with China.
Read the special at www.time.com/hk10th |
|
China cuts tax rebates on export
June 20, 2007
Permalink
China’s multi-year ballooning foreign trade surplus has caused the Chinese government on 19 June 2007 to announce major downward adjustments to export VAT refund rates.
This means that profits of exporters in many industries will fall significantly.
The announcement makes clear that the reductions of refund rates, and even the complete elimination of the export VAT refund in some cases, will apply to a broad range of products. These will include not only products that are socially or environmentally harmful (e.g. pollutioninducing, high energy or natural resource-consuming) and products from low value-added industries (e.g. clothing and shoes), but also for some strong export products. The changes come into force on 1 July 2007

For detailed information what categories of goods will be most affected by the new policy and the impact of the adjustments click here |
|
From ‘Made in China’ to ‘Sold in China’: The Rise of the Chinese Urban Consumer
June 12, 2007
Permalink
From ‘Made in China’ to ‘Sold in China’: The Rise of the Chinese Urban Consumer , a report by Mc Kinsey, a consultancy, argues that “as China transitions to a more consumption-led economy, Chinese incomes will grow and a massive middle class is expected to emerge. The urban consumer markets, in particular, will develop rapidly, moving from 43 percent of the population today, to 69 percent by 2015, and 76 percent by 2025. Most important, this urban phenomenon will spread beyond China’s large wealthy coastal cities, to smaller cities further inland.
As the incomes of the new middle class rise dramatically, China will become the third-largest consumer market in the world by 2025. A key characteristic of China’s new middle class will be that these households will begin to spend a larger proportion of their income on discretionary items, thus significantly changing the patterns of spending in the economy. It is important to note that the spectacular rise of China’s urban middle class, and its consequent impact on consumption, does not depend on major changes in Chinese savings behavior or on particular government policies (although certain policies could accelerate or slow the process). Even the impact of varying future growth rates tends to alter only the timing of these developments, not whether they happen at all.
To read the report click here |
|
Outsourcing comes of age, especially for supply chain activities
June 5, 2007
Permalink
“Outsourcing is growing fast and delivering results. More people than ever are outsourcing with no indication
that growth will slow. Our findings confirm that outsourcing has matured beyond cost reduction to become a way for organisations to better access talent and capabilities, gain more flexibility, reinvent their business model and drive innovation.” says a new report by PrcewaterhouseCoopers (PwC), a consultancy.
Supply chain activities such as production, logistics and distributions are the most outsourced business activities together with IT services. 53% of respondents to PwC survey outsource production or delivery of core products or services. This percentage will grow steadily in the next five year as the majority of the company surveyed intend to expand their current outsourcing over the next five years.
The report goes on in listing the main benefits that outsourcing delivers, the challenges to success and what customers and service providers think works best for them in real life outsourcing. It also provides evidence
that leading outsourcing customers and service providers are shifting from traditional to multisourcing, joint ventures, and open business models concluding that “As buyers increasingly seek to outsource core products and services, and suppliers rise to the challenge to deliver the skills and capabilities required, a new model of outsourcing is required: collaboration. Having an experienced, independent partner to help orchestrate new partnerships can give you the confidence to succeed.”
You can access the full article here |
|
The BRICs Dream
May 4, 2007
Permalink
Jim O'Neil, Head of Global Economic Research at Goldman Sachs, explains clearly and concisely in a web video the BRIC - Brazil, Russia, India and China- phenomenon: the role that their economies already have in the world today and how, over the next 50 years, together they could be larger than the G6.
You can access the full article here |
|
For those who do no think much about the trade-offs between lower product costs and higher overall costs and reduced profitability.
April 25, 2007
Permalink
George Stalk, senior vice president of the BCG, discuss in a article for Supply Chain Management Review how to reduce the time and variability in the China-anchored supply chains, as opposed to the conventional profit-improvement efforts, in order to reduce costs, boost margins, and improve competitive advantage.
According to Stalk, “rarely do executives think of supply chain investments as an outright source of competitive advantage. They underestimate the magnitude—and the impact on profitability—of the hidden costs of longer supply chains, reduced flexibility, and lost gross margin from missed sales and write-downs.
In their rush to source from China, many companies are blindly walking into a strategic trap. The trap is thinking that sourcing from China will result in lower product costs when, in reality, the supply chain dynamics will drive up overall costs and reduce profitability—thereby creating an opening for a competitor. Their only salvation is if all their competitors make the same mistake. But if they have competitors that do not source from China or that do focus on supply chain speed, their competitors will be competing with a different set of economics. The first company to see and correct the strategic error of sourcing from China without an appropriate investment in supply chain dynamics to minimize costs will seal the fate of its competitors.”
[Walking into the trap] “show more in the company's economic profits than in the accounting profits. Accounting profits capture the "generally accepted accounting practice" (GAAP) costs, revenues, and losses. Economic profits capture the hidden costs of lengthening supply chains: increased inventories, overproduction and underproduction, write-downs of excess inventories, and, most important, the lost margins from stockouts. In reality, accounting profits may be positive while economic profits are not.”
[…] “So what can companies do?
• They can aggressively manage their China-based supply chain, looking for ways to squeeze time from it that competitors haven't identified or exploited.
• They can explore alternatives that will minimize adverse effects on the supply chain. These alternatives may include options—such as increased use of air freight—that appear costly but may actually result in lower overall expenditure by reducing hidden costs.
• They can invest in premiums and capabilities. Premiums are the extra payments required to get preferred treatment from ground, sea, and air shippers, port services, and other suppliers. […] [Capabilities] can include cross-docking, facilitated portside handling, and "track and trace" capabilities to keep boxes moving.”
You can access the full article here |
|
|
Surpise: the balance of economic power is changing. Good.
April 3, 2007
Permalink
This week's special report on the world economy of The Economist points out that “the emerging world now accounts for over half of global economic output, measured in purchasing-power parity (which allows for lower prices in poorer countries). […] Developing countries chew up over half of the world's energy and hold most of its foreign-exchange reserves. Their share of exports has jumped from 20% in 1970 to 43% today. […] Maybe it will take a little longer than 2040 to fulfil Goldman Sachs's prediction that the world's ten biggest economies, using market exchange rates, will include Brazil, Russia, Mexico, India and China. But these are arguments about when, not whether, change will happen. And things could speed up: even the rosiest predictions underestimated Asia's ability to recover from its 1997 financial crisis.
This shift is not as extraordinary as it first seems. A historical perspective shows it to be the restoration of the old order. After all, China and India were the world's biggest economies until the mid-19th century, when technology and a spirit of freedom enabled the West to leap ahead. Nor should it be regarded as frightening. The West, as well as hundreds of millions of people in developing countries, has benefited from emerging-world growth. Globalisation is not a zero-sum game: Mexicans, Koreans and Poles are not growing at the expense of Americans, Japanese and Germans. Developing countries already buy half the combined exports of America, Japan and the euro area. As they get richer they will buy more. […]
But the two main challenges for the West are long-term political ones. One has to do with accepting that there will be some Western victims of globalisation. Adding 1.5 billion people to the global labour force has boosted the return to capital and richly rewarded rich Westerners; but in Germany, Japan and the United States, real wages for the median worker have barely budged. None of this is an excuse for protectionism—unless you want to make everybody poorer. But there may be fiercer debates, even in America, about using the tax and benefits system to redistribute more of the winnings.
The other challenge has to do with geopolitics. As the balance of economic power in the world changes, mustn't the balance of political power change too?
[…] Making such adjustments will no doubt be awkward. But these are the problems of success. A world in which most people enjoy prosperity and opportunity is surely better than one in which 80% are mired in economic stagnation. Celebrate the riches that globalisation has brought—and be prepared to defend the economic liberalisation that underpins it."
You can access the full article here |
|
Retail in China: unprecedented opportunity, in a battleground.
March 21, 2007
Permalink
Form The Economist special report: Retailing in China.
" Enormous numbers are luring global retailers to set up shop in China and take on a growing band of local operators. China's retail sales are set to expand by 13% to the equivalent of $860 billion this year, making the mainland the world's seventh-largest retail market. Annual compound growth rates of 8-10% will push this to an enormous $2.4 trillion by 2020.
There are more than one million affluent urban households, earning more than 100,000 yuan a year, who regularly buy luxury goods. But their spending power is rapidly being dwarfed by a vast emerging middle class. These households earn between 25,000 yuan (the threshold for becoming a serious consumer in China) and 100,000 yuan, says McKinsey. The consultancy estimates that the number of such households will rise from 42m in 2005 to 200m by 2015 “ […]
“
Apart from Wal-Mart, other successful giants have set up shop, including France's Carrefour, Britain's B&Q and Malaysia's Parkson. Foreign firms now account for 23% of the sales of the top 100 food retailers in China. More are arriving with the lifting of rules restricting foreign chains to a handful of big cities.”
According to the report, China is indeed an opportunity but it has become a brutally competitive market in which only the strong will survive: local competitors restore to dirty tactics, commercial-property prices are soaring, marketing expenses are growing, severe overcapacity keeps product prices low, average spending per visit is tiny, store productivity is declining, sales per square foot are falling and profit margin are shrinking, distribution and logistic within China is poor, Chinese consumer are brand conscious but not loyal, with huge variations of taste, in sourcing products retailer have to deal with many layers of middle-men and a huge number of suppliers, local supermarket are rapidly introducing improvements and catching up with the best of foreign chains, making competition even more intense.
“ But there will be handsome rewards for those that can survive this battle of hypermarket proportions.”
You can access the full article here |
|
Made in China, who really profits?
March 4, 2007
Permalink
Thomas Fuller in the International Herald Tribune provides an interesting analysis about who profits, and how much, on the current wave of western companies moving the manufacture of their products to China.
"U.S. and European officials argue that factories like these, relatively unencumbered by regulation and sheltered by an undervalued currency, give China an unfair advantage. But a close-up look at the Tianjin Jiahua Footwear factory shows a different picture, one of vulnerability and tiny margins on the Chinese side.
The biggest earnings in the mass manufacturing business, according to factory owners and other industry executives, both foreign and Chinese, are not made by companies producing the shoes, but by those who market and sell them in the United States. [...] A Chinese factory makes leather work boots and sells them for $15.30 a pair, earning a profit of $0.65. The U.S. retailer sells them for $49.99 and expects a profit of $3.46".
Fuller's analysis also looks at the two issues that critics use in saying that China has unfair advantages: "The money that the Tianjin factory workers is so small that if every salary in the factory were doubled, the final shelf price in the U.S. retail outlet would increase from $49.99 to $51 and change. Neither would an appreciation of the Chinese currency - which the U.S. manufacturing lobby says is needed to keep Chinese factories from undercutting U.S>-made goods - make much difference to an American consumer.
About half the cost of making the Tianjin work boot is partially or fully denominated in dollars, including the leather from the United States and the synthetic rubber sole made from imported petrochemicals. With such a large proportion of the boot's final retail value accrued outside China, an increase of 10% in the Yuan might rise that price by a mere 1.3%." |
|
| back to top |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
|